Dropbox vs Zscaler, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Dropbox and Zscaler, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Dropbox (rank #257) holds a narrow lead over Zscaler, Inc. (rank #298) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (47 vs 45). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zscaler, Inc. is clearly ahead of Dropbox. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zscaler, Inc. is ahead of Dropbox. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Dropbox is slightly ahead of Zscaler, Inc.. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Dropbox is ahead of Zscaler, Inc..
Dropbox carries 61,045 GitHub stars across 247 public repos, with 29 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Zscaler, Inc. shows 337 stars across 58 public repos, 33 active in the last 90 days and 11 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Dropbox's footprint is roughly 181.1x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Dropbox is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Zscaler, Inc. looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Dropbox | Zscaler, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #257 | #298 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 47 | 45 |
| Code | 48 | 76 |
| Education | 51 | 65 |
| Community | 46 | 39 |
| Reach | 37 | 37 |
| Momentum | 58 | 40 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 61,045 | 337 |
| Forks | 8,223 | 199 |
| Public repos | 247 | 58 |
| Active repos (90d) | 29 | 33 |
| External contributors | 2 | 11 |
| Avg polish | 52 | 86 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 33 | 61 |