Duolingo vs Orca Security
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Duolingo and Orca Security both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Duolingo (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over Orca Security (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 35). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Duolingo is slightly ahead of Orca Security. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Orca Security is ahead of Duolingo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Duolingo is clearly ahead of Orca Security. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Orca Security is clearly ahead of Duolingo.
Duolingo carries 1,721 GitHub stars across 12 public repos, with 8 repositories active in the last 90 days and 11 external contributors on record. Orca Security shows 230 stars across 35 public repos, 17 active in the last 90 days and 12 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Duolingo's footprint is roughly 7.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Duolingo is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Orca Security looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Duolingo | Orca Security |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #338 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 43 | 35 |
| Code | 44 | 40 |
| Education | 47 | 57 |
| Community | 37 | 37 |
| Reach | 49 | 21 |
| Momentum | 38 | 59 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,721 | 230 |
| Forks | 267 | 73 |
| Public repos | 12 | 35 |
| Active repos (90d) | 8 | 17 |
| External contributors | 11 | 12 |
| Avg polish | 51 | 41 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 30 | 23 |