Duo Security vs Jamf
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Duo Security and Jamf both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Duo Security (rank #278) holds a narrow lead over Jamf (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (46 vs 40). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Duo Security is clearly ahead of Jamf. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Duo Security is slightly ahead of Jamf. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Jamf is ahead of Duo Security. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Jamf is ahead of Duo Security. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Jamf is slightly ahead of Duo Security.
Duo Security carries 1,477 GitHub stars across 52 public repos, with 15 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. Jamf shows 7,946 stars across 114 public repos, 20 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Jamf's footprint is roughly 5.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Duo Security is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Jamf looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Duo Security | Jamf |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #278 | #430 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 46 | 40 |
| Code | 63 | 33 |
| Education | 69 | 68 |
| Community | 30 | 41 |
| Reach | 24 | 44 |
| Momentum | 58 | 61 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,477 | 7,946 |
| Forks | 1,092 | 1,547 |
| Public repos | 52 | 114 |
| Active repos (90d) | 15 | 20 |
| External contributors | 6 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 66 | 45 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 43 | 21 |