Duo Security vs Loom
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Duo Security and Loom (Async Video Messaging for Work) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Duo Security (rank #278) holds a modest lead over Loom (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (46 vs 31). The gap of 15 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Duo Security is clearly ahead of Loom. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Duo Security is ahead of Loom. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Duo Security is ahead of Loom. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Duo Security is clearly ahead of Loom. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Duo Security is clearly ahead of Loom.
Duo Security carries 1,477 GitHub stars across 52 public repos, with 15 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. Loom shows 50 stars across 32 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Duo Security's footprint is roughly 29.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Duo Security is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Loom makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Duo Security | Loom |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #278 | #693 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 46 | 31 |
| Code | 63 | 37 |
| Education | 69 | 52 |
| Community | 30 | 11 |
| Reach | 24 | 3 |
| Momentum | 58 | 30 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,477 | 50 |
| Forks | 1,092 | 13 |
| Public repos | 52 | 32 |
| Active repos (90d) | 15 | 5 |
| External contributors | 6 | 1 |
| Avg polish | 66 | 32 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 43 | 34 |