Duo Security vs Stripe Samples
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Duo Security and Stripe Samples (Sample integrations built by Stripe.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Stripe Samples (rank #141) holds a narrow lead over Duo Security (rank #278) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (53 vs 46). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Stripe Samples is slightly ahead of Duo Security. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Stripe Samples is ahead of Duo Security. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Stripe Samples is ahead of Duo Security. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Duo Security is ahead of Stripe Samples. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Duo Security is slightly ahead of Stripe Samples.
Duo Security carries 1,477 GitHub stars across 52 public repos, with 15 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. Stripe Samples shows 4,227 stars across 30 public repos, 23 active in the last 90 days and 8 external contributors.
Duo Security is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Stripe Samples looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Duo Security | Stripe Samples |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #278 | #141 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 46 | 53 |
| Code | 63 | 66 |
| Education | 69 | 85 |
| Community | 30 | 47 |
| Reach | 24 | 8 |
| Momentum | 58 | 52 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,477 | 4,227 |
| Forks | 1,092 | 2,301 |
| Public repos | 52 | 30 |
| Active repos (90d) | 15 | 23 |
| External contributors | 6 | 8 |
| Avg polish | 66 | 76 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 43 | 34 |