We do love open source and have an opportunity to make it better from now.
Ecwid vs Semrush
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Ecwid and Semrush (We do love open source and have an opportunity to make it better from now.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Semrush (rank #316) holds a modest lead over Ecwid (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 30). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Semrush is slightly ahead of Ecwid. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Semrush is slightly ahead of Ecwid. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Semrush is clearly ahead of Ecwid. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Semrush is clearly ahead of Ecwid.
Ecwid carries 1,169 GitHub stars across 43 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 10 external contributors on record. Semrush shows 454 stars across 11 public repos, 2 active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors.
Ecwid is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Semrush looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Ecwid | Semrush |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #728 | #316 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 30 | 44 |
| Code | 44 | 44 |
| Education | 57 | 65 |
| Community | 31 | 36 |
| Reach | 0 | 35 |
| Momentum | 12 | 37 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,169 | 454 |
| Forks | 623 | 124 |
| Public repos | 43 | 11 |
| Active repos (90d) | 6 | 2 |
| External contributors | 10 | 7 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 48 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 22 | 32 |