Ecwid vs sendinblue (now Brevo)
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Ecwid and sendinblue (now Brevo) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
sendinblue (now Brevo) (rank #372) holds a modest lead over Ecwid (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 30). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), sendinblue (now Brevo) is slightly ahead of Ecwid. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), sendinblue (now Brevo) is ahead of Ecwid. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Ecwid is ahead of sendinblue (now Brevo). On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), sendinblue (now Brevo) is clearly ahead of Ecwid. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Ecwid is ahead of sendinblue (now Brevo).
Ecwid carries 1,169 GitHub stars across 43 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 10 external contributors on record. sendinblue (now Brevo) shows 653 stars across 37 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
Ecwid is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. sendinblue (now Brevo) looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Ecwid | sendinblue (now Brevo) |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #728 | #372 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 30 | 42 |
| Code | 44 | 47 |
| Education | 57 | 76 |
| Community | 31 | 15 |
| Reach | 0 | 31 |
| Momentum | 12 | 0 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,169 | 653 |
| Forks | 623 | 328 |
| Public repos | 43 | 37 |
| Active repos (90d) | 6 | 0 |
| External contributors | 10 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 42 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 22 | 40 |