Opensource SDKs for the Smartsheet collaborative work management platform
Ecwid vs Smartsheet
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Ecwid and Smartsheet (Opensource SDKs for the Smartsheet collaborative work management platform) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Smartsheet (rank #336) holds a modest lead over Ecwid (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 30). The gap of 13 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Smartsheet is clearly ahead of Ecwid. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Smartsheet is slightly ahead of Ecwid. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Smartsheet is clearly ahead of Ecwid. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Smartsheet is clearly ahead of Ecwid.
Ecwid carries 1,169 GitHub stars across 43 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 10 external contributors on record. Smartsheet shows 150 stars across 11 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 15 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Ecwid's footprint is roughly 7.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Ecwid is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Smartsheet looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Ecwid | Smartsheet |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #728 | #336 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 30 | 43 |
| Code | 44 | 44 |
| Education | 57 | 85 |
| Community | 31 | 38 |
| Reach | 0 | 35 |
| Momentum | 12 | 34 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,169 | 150 |
| Forks | 623 | 144 |
| Public repos | 43 | 11 |
| Active repos (90d) | 6 | 8 |
| External contributors | 10 | 15 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 47 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 22 | 39 |