edX vs IFTTT

edX (Online learning at https://edx.org, powered by the Open edX platform https://openedx.org) and IFTTT (Automations for business and home. 1,000+ of your favorite apps, services and devices. Save time and get more done.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

edX (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over IFTTT (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 40). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), edX is ahead of IFTTT. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), IFTTT is clearly ahead of edX. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), IFTTT is ahead of edX. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), IFTTT is clearly ahead of edX. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), edX is clearly ahead of IFTTT.

edX carries 392 GitHub stars across 250 public repos, with 52 repositories active in the last 90 days and 22 external contributors on record. IFTTT shows 15,307 stars across 75 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but IFTTT's footprint is roughly 39.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

edX is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. IFTTT looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.