Online learning at https://edx.org, powered by the Open edX platform https://openedx.org
edX vs Lansweeper NV
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
edX (Online learning at https://edx.org, powered by the Open edX platform https://openedx.org) and Lansweeper NV (All development of lansweeper) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
edX (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Lansweeper NV (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 30). The gap of 13 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), edX is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Lansweeper NV is ahead of edX. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), edX is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Lansweeper NV is ahead of edX. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), edX is ahead of Lansweeper NV.
edX carries 392 GitHub stars across 250 public repos, with 52 repositories active in the last 90 days and 22 external contributors on record. Lansweeper NV shows 0 stars across 0 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
edX is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Lansweeper NV looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | edX | Lansweeper NV |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #338 | #728 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 43 | 30 |
| Code | 58 | 0 |
| Education | 43 | 60 |
| Community | 22 | 0 |
| Reach | 33 | 50 |
| Momentum | 48 | 28 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 392 | 0 |
| Forks | 376 | 0 |
| Public repos | 250 | 0 |
| Active repos (90d) | 52 | 0 |
| External contributors | 22 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 58 | 0 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 0 |