Online learning at https://edx.org, powered by the Open edX platform https://openedx.org
edX vs Qonto
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
edX (Online learning at https://edx.org, powered by the Open edX platform https://openedx.org) and Qonto both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
edX and Qonto sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (43), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), edX is slightly ahead of Qonto. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Qonto is clearly ahead of edX. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Qonto is slightly ahead of edX. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), edX is ahead of Qonto. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), edX is clearly ahead of Qonto.
edX carries 392 GitHub stars across 250 public repos, with 52 repositories active in the last 90 days and 22 external contributors on record. Qonto shows 501 stars across 75 public repos, 11 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
edX is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Qonto looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | edX | Qonto |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #338 | #338 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 43 | 43 |
| Code | 58 | 57 |
| Education | 43 | 75 |
| Community | 22 | 25 |
| Reach | 33 | 24 |
| Momentum | 48 | 21 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 392 | 501 |
| Forks | 376 | 158 |
| Public repos | 250 | 75 |
| Active repos (90d) | 52 | 11 |
| External contributors | 22 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 58 | 62 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 36 |