Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

edX vs Webflow

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

edX (Online learning at https://edx.org, powered by the Open edX platform https://openedx.org) and Webflow (Webflow is the way to design, build, and launch powerful websites visually - without coding.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Webflow (rank #122) holds a modest lead over edX (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (54 vs 43). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), edX is ahead of Webflow. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Webflow is clearly ahead of edX. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Webflow is ahead of edX. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Webflow is ahead of edX. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), edX is slightly ahead of Webflow.

edX carries 392 GitHub stars across 250 public repos, with 52 repositories active in the last 90 days and 22 external contributors on record. Webflow shows 735 stars across 52 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 16 external contributors.

edX is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Webflow looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricedXWebflow
Ranking
Overall rank#338#122
Pillars
Overall4354
Code5845
Education4380
Community2232
Reach3350
Momentum4846
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars392735
Forks376235
Public repos25052
Active repos (90d)529
External contributors2216
Avg polish5844
Avg AI-readiness3731

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View edX developer profileView Webflow developer profile