Elastic Path Software vs HubSpot

Elastic Path Software and HubSpot both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

HubSpot (rank #93) holds a meaningful lead over Elastic Path Software (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (56 vs 31). The gap of 25 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Elastic Path Software is slightly ahead of HubSpot. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Elastic Path Software is slightly ahead of HubSpot. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), HubSpot is ahead of Elastic Path Software. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), HubSpot is clearly ahead of Elastic Path Software. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), HubSpot is clearly ahead of Elastic Path Software.

Elastic Path Software carries 234 GitHub stars across 39 public repos, with 8 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. HubSpot shows 53,481 stars across 381 public repos, 35 active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but HubSpot's footprint is roughly 228.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Elastic Path Software is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. HubSpot looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.