Elastic Path Software vs Typeform
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Elastic Path Software and Typeform both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Typeform (rank #189) holds a modest lead over Elastic Path Software (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 31). The gap of 19 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Typeform is ahead of Elastic Path Software. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Elastic Path Software is slightly ahead of Typeform. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Typeform is slightly ahead of Elastic Path Software. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Typeform is clearly ahead of Elastic Path Software. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Typeform is ahead of Elastic Path Software.
Elastic Path Software carries 234 GitHub stars across 39 public repos, with 8 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Typeform shows 590 stars across 40 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
Elastic Path Software is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Typeform looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Elastic Path Software | Typeform |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #693 | #189 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 31 | 50 |
| Code | 57 | 71 |
| Education | 54 | 51 |
| Community | 24 | 25 |
| Reach | 8 | 43 |
| Momentum | 16 | 31 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 234 | 590 |
| Forks | 80 | 254 |
| Public repos | 39 | 40 |
| Active repos (90d) | 8 | 8 |
| External contributors | 3 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 52 | 75 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 43 | 38 |