Elastic Path Software vs Wrike

Elastic Path Software and Wrike (Welcome to the Wrike TechClub open source community. Let's make tech world better together! NB: members must have two-factor auth.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Wrike (rank #600) holds a narrow lead over Elastic Path Software (rank #696) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (34 vs 31). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Elastic Path Software is slightly ahead of Wrike. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Wrike is clearly ahead of Elastic Path Software. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Elastic Path Software is ahead of Wrike. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Wrike is slightly ahead of Elastic Path Software. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Wrike is ahead of Elastic Path Software.

Elastic Path Software carries 234 GitHub stars across 39 public repos, with 8 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Wrike shows 276 stars across 33 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.

Elastic Path Software is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Wrike looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.