Founded by the creators of Matrix, we build digitally sovereign, secure and interoperable real-time communication solutions for large organisations.
Millions of users rely on Grammarly's AI-powered products to make their messages, documents, and social media posts clear, mistake-free, and impactful.
Element vs Grammarly
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Element (Founded by the creators of Matrix, we build digitally sovereign, secure and interoperable real-time communication solutions for large organisations.) and Grammarly (Millions of users rely on Grammarly's AI-powered products to make their messages, documents, and social media posts clear, mistake-free, and impactful.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Element (rank #190) holds a modest lead over Grammarly (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 34). The gap of 16 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Element is clearly ahead of Grammarly. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Element is slightly ahead of Grammarly. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Element is clearly ahead of Grammarly. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Element is ahead of Grammarly. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Element is clearly ahead of Grammarly.
Element carries 34,608 GitHub stars across 137 public repos, with 33 repositories active in the last 90 days and 97 external contributors on record. Grammarly shows 4,355 stars across 23 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Element's footprint is roughly 7.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Element is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Grammarly makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Element | Grammarly |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #190 | #602 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 50 | 34 |
| Code | 74 | 43 |
| Education | 58 | 55 |
| Community | 51 | 27 |
| Reach | 50 | 37 |
| Momentum | 60 | 28 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 34,608 | 4,355 |
| Forks | 7,559 | 468 |
| Public repos | 137 | 23 |
| Active repos (90d) | 33 | 0 |
| External contributors | 97 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 75 | 45 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 50 | 30 |