Element vs Wrike

Element (Founded by the creators of Matrix, we build digitally sovereign, secure and interoperable real-time communication solutions for large organisations.) and Wrike (Welcome to the Wrike TechClub open source community. Let's make tech world better together! NB: members must have two-factor auth.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Element (rank #189) holds a modest lead over Wrike (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 34). The gap of 16 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Element is clearly ahead of Wrike. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Wrike is ahead of Element. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Element is clearly ahead of Wrike. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Element is clearly ahead of Wrike. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Element is clearly ahead of Wrike.

Element carries 34,608 GitHub stars across 137 public repos, with 33 repositories active in the last 90 days and 97 external contributors on record. Wrike shows 276 stars across 33 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Element's footprint is roughly 125.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Element is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Wrike looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.