Elementor vs Iterable
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Elementor and Iterable both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Elementor and Iterable sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (44), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Elementor is slightly ahead of Iterable. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Iterable is slightly ahead of Elementor. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Elementor is ahead of Iterable. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Elementor is ahead of Iterable. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Iterable is clearly ahead of Elementor.
Elementor carries 10,938 GitHub stars across 67 public repos, with 9 repositories active in the last 90 days and 45 external contributors on record. Iterable shows 269 stars across 100 public repos, 16 active in the last 90 days and 10 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Elementor's footprint is roughly 40.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Elementor is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Iterable looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Elementor | Iterable |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #317 | #317 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 44 | 44 |
| Code | 55 | 51 |
| Education | 56 | 59 |
| Community | 49 | 35 |
| Reach | 29 | 16 |
| Momentum | 18 | 58 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 10,938 | 269 |
| Forks | 4,296 | 212 |
| Public repos | 67 | 100 |
| Active repos (90d) | 9 | 16 |
| External contributors | 45 | 10 |
| Avg polish | 56 | 53 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 31 | 34 |