Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Eli-Lilly vs ggml

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Eli-Lilly and ggml (AI inference at the edge) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ggml (rank #103) holds a meaningful lead over Eli-Lilly (rank #1095) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (55 vs 10). The gap of 45 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ggml is clearly ahead of Eli-Lilly. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ggml is clearly ahead of Eli-Lilly. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ggml is clearly ahead of Eli-Lilly. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ggml is clearly ahead of Eli-Lilly. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ggml is clearly ahead of Eli-Lilly.

Eli-Lilly carries 0 GitHub stars across 0 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. ggml shows 191,415 stars across 22 public repos, 15 active in the last 90 days and 308 external contributors.

Eli-Lilly is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. ggml looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricEli-Lillyggml
Ranking
Overall rank#1095#103
Pillars
Overall1055
Code047
Education1078
Community080
Reach4490
Momentum034
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars0191,415
Forks028,215
Public repos022
Active repos (90d)015
External contributors0308
Avg polish050
Avg AI-readiness032

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Eli-Lilly developer profileView ggml developer profile