Eli-Lilly vs Open WebUI
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Eli-Lilly and Open WebUI (On a mission to build the best AI user interface.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Open WebUI (rank #189) holds a meaningful lead over Eli-Lilly (rank #1095) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 10). The gap of 40 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Open WebUI is clearly ahead of Eli-Lilly. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Open WebUI is clearly ahead of Eli-Lilly. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Open WebUI is clearly ahead of Eli-Lilly. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Eli-Lilly is ahead of Open WebUI. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Open WebUI is clearly ahead of Eli-Lilly.
Eli-Lilly carries 0 GitHub stars across 0 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Open WebUI shows 159,650 stars across 25 public repos, 12 active in the last 90 days and 198 external contributors.
Eli-Lilly is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Open WebUI looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Eli-Lilly | Open WebUI |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #1095 | #189 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 10 | 50 |
| Code | 0 | 55 |
| Education | 10 | 85 |
| Community | 0 | 57 |
| Reach | 44 | 34 |
| Momentum | 0 | 38 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 0 | 159,650 |
| Forks | 0 | 23,667 |
| Public repos | 0 | 25 |
| Active repos (90d) | 0 | 12 |
| External contributors | 0 | 198 |
| Avg polish | 0 | 60 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 0 | 36 |