Evernote vs Formbricks
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Evernote and Formbricks (Open Source Qualtrics Alternative) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Formbricks (rank #237) holds a modest lead over Evernote (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 35). The gap of 13 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Formbricks is slightly ahead of Evernote. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Evernote is ahead of Formbricks. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Formbricks is clearly ahead of Evernote. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Formbricks is slightly ahead of Evernote. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Formbricks is clearly ahead of Evernote.
Evernote carries 9,832 GitHub stars across 22 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Formbricks shows 12,675 stars across 18 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors.
Evernote is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Formbricks looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Evernote | Formbricks |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #569 | #237 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 35 | 48 |
| Code | 45 | 53 |
| Education | 78 | 67 |
| Community | 18 | 47 |
| Reach | 32 | 36 |
| Momentum | 2 | 24 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 9,832 | 12,675 |
| Forks | 1,848 | 2,459 |
| Public repos | 22 | 18 |
| Active repos (90d) | 1 | 9 |
| External contributors | 0 | 6 |
| Avg polish | 49 | 57 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 37 |