Evernote vs Humaans
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Evernote and Humaans (A better workplace starts here) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Evernote (rank #569) holds a narrow lead over Humaans (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (35 vs 32). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Humaans is slightly ahead of Evernote. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Evernote is slightly ahead of Humaans. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Evernote is slightly ahead of Humaans. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Evernote is clearly ahead of Humaans. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Humaans is clearly ahead of Evernote.
Evernote carries 9,832 GitHub stars across 22 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Humaans shows 461 stars across 9 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Evernote's footprint is roughly 21.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Evernote is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Humaans looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Evernote | Humaans |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #569 | #662 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 35 | 32 |
| Code | 45 | 50 |
| Education | 78 | 71 |
| Community | 18 | 16 |
| Reach | 32 | 0 |
| Momentum | 2 | 24 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 9,832 | 461 |
| Forks | 1,848 | 18 |
| Public repos | 22 | 9 |
| Active repos (90d) | 1 | 4 |
| External contributors | 0 | 2 |
| Avg polish | 49 | 41 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 43 |