Evernote vs InVision
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Evernote and InVision both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
InVision (rank #430) holds a narrow lead over Evernote (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (40 vs 35). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), InVision is slightly ahead of Evernote. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), InVision is slightly ahead of Evernote. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Evernote is slightly ahead of InVision. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), InVision is slightly ahead of Evernote. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Evernote is slightly ahead of InVision.
Evernote carries 9,832 GitHub stars across 22 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. InVision shows 1,303 stars across 114 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Evernote's footprint is roughly 7.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Evernote is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. InVision looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Evernote | InVision |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #569 | #430 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 35 | 40 |
| Code | 45 | 46 |
| Education | 78 | 80 |
| Community | 18 | 14 |
| Reach | 32 | 40 |
| Momentum | 2 | 0 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 9,832 | 1,303 |
| Forks | 1,848 | 193 |
| Public repos | 22 | 114 |
| Active repos (90d) | 1 | 0 |
| External contributors | 0 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 49 | 52 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 34 |