Evernote vs Jamf
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Evernote and Jamf both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Jamf (rank #430) holds a narrow lead over Evernote (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (40 vs 35). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Evernote is ahead of Jamf. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Evernote is ahead of Jamf. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Jamf is clearly ahead of Evernote. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Jamf is ahead of Evernote. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Jamf is clearly ahead of Evernote.
Evernote carries 9,832 GitHub stars across 22 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Jamf shows 7,946 stars across 114 public repos, 20 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
Evernote is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Jamf looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Evernote | Jamf |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #569 | #430 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 35 | 40 |
| Code | 45 | 33 |
| Education | 78 | 68 |
| Community | 18 | 41 |
| Reach | 32 | 44 |
| Momentum | 2 | 61 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 9,832 | 7,946 |
| Forks | 1,848 | 1,547 |
| Public repos | 22 | 114 |
| Active repos (90d) | 1 | 20 |
| External contributors | 0 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 49 | 45 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 21 |