Evernote vs Zapier
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Evernote and Zapier both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Zapier (rank #28) holds a meaningful lead over Evernote (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (64 vs 35). The gap of 29 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zapier is clearly ahead of Evernote. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Evernote is slightly ahead of Zapier. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zapier is ahead of Evernote. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Zapier is clearly ahead of Evernote. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zapier is clearly ahead of Evernote.
Evernote carries 9,832 GitHub stars across 22 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Zapier shows 6,774 stars across 296 public repos, 13 active in the last 90 days and 22 external contributors.
Evernote is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Zapier looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Evernote | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #569 | #28 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 35 | 64 |
| Code | 45 | 68 |
| Education | 78 | 73 |
| Community | 18 | 37 |
| Reach | 32 | 63 |
| Momentum | 2 | 54 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 9,832 | 6,774 |
| Forks | 1,848 | 1,358 |
| Public repos | 22 | 296 |
| Active repos (90d) | 1 | 13 |
| External contributors | 0 | 22 |
| Avg polish | 49 | 79 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 43 |