Expensify, Inc vs Heap
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Expensify, Inc and Heap (Product Insights) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Expensify, Inc (rank #165) holds a modest lead over Heap (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 35). The gap of 16 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Expensify, Inc is clearly ahead of Heap. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Heap is ahead of Expensify, Inc. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Expensify, Inc is clearly ahead of Heap. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Heap is ahead of Expensify, Inc. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Expensify, Inc is clearly ahead of Heap.
Expensify, Inc carries 9,942 GitHub stars across 66 public repos, with 18 repositories active in the last 90 days and 141 external contributors on record. Heap shows 215 stars across 65 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Expensify, Inc's footprint is roughly 46.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Expensify, Inc is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Heap looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Expensify, Inc | Heap |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #165 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 51 | 35 |
| Code | 57 | 35 |
| Education | 63 | 72 |
| Community | 44 | 14 |
| Reach | 18 | 30 |
| Momentum | 59 | 12 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 9,942 | 215 |
| Forks | 5,111 | 105 |
| Public repos | 66 | 65 |
| Active repos (90d) | 18 | 6 |
| External contributors | 141 | 1 |
| Avg polish | 53 | 37 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 42 | 23 |