Expensify, Inc vs Jamf
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Expensify, Inc and Jamf both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Expensify, Inc (rank #165) holds a modest lead over Jamf (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 40). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Expensify, Inc is clearly ahead of Jamf. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Jamf is slightly ahead of Expensify, Inc. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Expensify, Inc is slightly ahead of Jamf. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Jamf is clearly ahead of Expensify, Inc. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Jamf is slightly ahead of Expensify, Inc.
Expensify, Inc carries 9,942 GitHub stars across 66 public repos, with 18 repositories active in the last 90 days and 141 external contributors on record. Jamf shows 7,946 stars across 114 public repos, 20 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
Expensify, Inc is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Jamf looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Expensify, Inc | Jamf |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #165 | #430 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 51 | 40 |
| Code | 57 | 33 |
| Education | 63 | 68 |
| Community | 44 | 41 |
| Reach | 18 | 44 |
| Momentum | 59 | 61 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 9,942 | 7,946 |
| Forks | 5,111 | 1,547 |
| Public repos | 66 | 114 |
| Active repos (90d) | 18 | 20 |
| External contributors | 141 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 53 | 45 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 42 | 21 |