Expensify, Inc vs Metabase
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Expensify, Inc and Metabase both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Expensify, Inc and Metabase sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (51), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Expensify, Inc is slightly ahead of Metabase. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Metabase is ahead of Expensify, Inc. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Expensify, Inc is slightly ahead of Metabase. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Metabase is clearly ahead of Expensify, Inc. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Metabase is slightly ahead of Expensify, Inc.
Expensify, Inc carries 9,942 GitHub stars across 66 public repos, with 18 repositories active in the last 90 days and 141 external contributors on record. Metabase shows 50,225 stars across 100 public repos, 21 active in the last 90 days and 49 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Metabase's footprint is roughly 5.1x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Expensify, Inc is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Metabase looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Expensify, Inc | Metabase |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #165 | #165 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 51 | 51 |
| Code | 57 | 49 |
| Education | 63 | 80 |
| Community | 44 | 39 |
| Reach | 18 | 41 |
| Momentum | 59 | 61 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 9,942 | 50,225 |
| Forks | 5,111 | 7,167 |
| Public repos | 66 | 100 |
| Active repos (90d) | 18 | 21 |
| External contributors | 141 | 49 |
| Avg polish | 53 | 50 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 42 | 30 |