Expensify, Inc vs Skyscanner
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Expensify, Inc and Skyscanner both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Expensify, Inc (rank #165) holds a narrow lead over Skyscanner (rank #209) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 49). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Skyscanner is ahead of Expensify, Inc. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Skyscanner is ahead of Expensify, Inc. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Expensify, Inc is slightly ahead of Skyscanner. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Skyscanner is ahead of Expensify, Inc. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Expensify, Inc is ahead of Skyscanner.
Expensify, Inc carries 9,942 GitHub stars across 66 public repos, with 18 repositories active in the last 90 days and 141 external contributors on record. Skyscanner shows 8,167 stars across 86 public repos, 18 active in the last 90 days and 39 external contributors.
Expensify, Inc is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Skyscanner looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Expensify, Inc | Skyscanner |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #165 | #209 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 51 | 49 |
| Code | 57 | 67 |
| Education | 63 | 72 |
| Community | 44 | 40 |
| Reach | 18 | 32 |
| Momentum | 59 | 41 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 9,942 | 8,167 |
| Forks | 5,111 | 1,526 |
| Public repos | 66 | 86 |
| Active repos (90d) | 18 | 18 |
| External contributors | 141 | 39 |
| Avg polish | 53 | 74 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 42 | 47 |