Expensify, Inc vs Swiggy
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Expensify, Inc and Swiggy (Swiggy Public Repos) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Expensify, Inc (rank #165) holds a modest lead over Swiggy (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 32). The gap of 19 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Expensify, Inc is clearly ahead of Swiggy. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Expensify, Inc is slightly ahead of Swiggy. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Expensify, Inc is ahead of Swiggy. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Expensify, Inc is clearly ahead of Swiggy.
Expensify, Inc carries 9,942 GitHub stars across 66 public repos, with 18 repositories active in the last 90 days and 141 external contributors on record. Swiggy shows 314 stars across 22 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Expensify, Inc's footprint is roughly 31.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Expensify, Inc is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Swiggy makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Expensify, Inc | Swiggy |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #165 | #662 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 51 | 32 |
| Code | 57 | 36 |
| Education | 63 | 55 |
| Community | 44 | 30 |
| Reach | 18 | 18 |
| Momentum | 59 | 34 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 9,942 | 314 |
| Forks | 5,111 | 93 |
| Public repos | 66 | 22 |
| Active repos (90d) | 18 | 3 |
| External contributors | 141 | 1 |
| Avg polish | 53 | 37 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 42 | 32 |