Expensify, Inc vs UserTesting

Expensify, Inc and UserTesting (Real. Human. Insight.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Expensify, Inc (rank #162) holds a modest lead over UserTesting (rank #691) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 31). The gap of 20 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Expensify, Inc is ahead of UserTesting. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Expensify, Inc is slightly ahead of UserTesting. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Expensify, Inc is clearly ahead of UserTesting. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), UserTesting is ahead of Expensify, Inc. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Expensify, Inc is clearly ahead of UserTesting.

Expensify, Inc carries 9,951 GitHub stars across 66 public repos, with 18 repositories active in the last 90 days and 132 external contributors on record. UserTesting shows 15 stars across 119 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Expensify, Inc's footprint is roughly 663.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Expensify, Inc is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. UserTesting looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.