Expensify, Inc vs Zammad
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Expensify, Inc and Zammad both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Zammad (rank #152) holds a narrow lead over Expensify, Inc (rank #165) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (52 vs 51). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zammad is slightly ahead of Expensify, Inc. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zammad is slightly ahead of Expensify, Inc. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zammad is clearly ahead of Expensify, Inc. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Expensify, Inc is ahead of Zammad. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Expensify, Inc is ahead of Zammad.
Expensify, Inc carries 9,942 GitHub stars across 66 public repos, with 18 repositories active in the last 90 days and 141 external contributors on record. Zammad shows 6,394 stars across 11 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 27 external contributors.
Expensify, Inc is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Zammad looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Expensify, Inc | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #165 | #152 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 51 | 52 |
| Code | 57 | 63 |
| Education | 63 | 71 |
| Community | 44 | 70 |
| Reach | 18 | 0 |
| Momentum | 59 | 39 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 9,942 | 6,394 |
| Forks | 5,111 | 1,687 |
| Public repos | 66 | 11 |
| Active repos (90d) | 18 | 9 |
| External contributors | 141 | 27 |
| Avg polish | 53 | 71 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 42 | 35 |