Factorial vs Plausible Analytics

Factorial (HR Software for small and medium companies) and Plausible Analytics (Simple, open source, lightweight (< 1 KB) and privacy-friendly alternative to Google Analytics.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Factorial (rank #237) holds a narrow lead over Plausible Analytics (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 43). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Factorial is slightly ahead of Plausible Analytics. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Plausible Analytics is slightly ahead of Factorial. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Plausible Analytics is clearly ahead of Factorial. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Plausible Analytics is clearly ahead of Factorial. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Factorial is clearly ahead of Plausible Analytics.

Factorial carries 117 GitHub stars across 70 public repos, with 19 repositories active in the last 90 days and 53 external contributors on record. Plausible Analytics shows 31,145 stars across 21 public repos, 7 active in the last 90 days and 23 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Plausible Analytics's footprint is roughly 266.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Factorial is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Plausible Analytics looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.