Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Fastmail vs Ironclad

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Fastmail (Open-source software developed at Fastmail.) and Ironclad both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Fastmail (rank #430) holds a narrow lead over Ironclad (rank #455) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (40 vs 39). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Ironclad is slightly ahead of Fastmail. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Ironclad is ahead of Fastmail. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Fastmail is clearly ahead of Ironclad. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Fastmail is clearly ahead of Ironclad.

Fastmail carries 6,316 GitHub stars across 38 public repos, with 12 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Ironclad shows 4,723 stars across 8 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.

Fastmail is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Ironclad looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricFastmailIronclad
Ranking
Overall rank#430#455
Pillars
Overall4039
Code3538
Education6677
Community3333
Reach7832
Momentum446
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars6,3164,723
Forks571431
Public repos388
Active repos (90d)121
External contributors25
Avg polish3539
Avg AI-readiness1430

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Fastmail developer profileView Ironclad developer profile