Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Fastmail vs Sage

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Fastmail (Open-source software developed at Fastmail.) and Sage both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Fastmail (rank #430) holds a narrow lead over Sage (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (40 vs 33). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Sage is clearly ahead of Fastmail. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Fastmail is ahead of Sage. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Sage is slightly ahead of Fastmail. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Fastmail is clearly ahead of Sage. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Fastmail is clearly ahead of Sage.

Fastmail carries 6,316 GitHub stars across 38 public repos, with 12 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Sage shows 2,180 stars across 122 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 22 external contributors.

Fastmail is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Sage looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricFastmailSage
Ranking
Overall rank#430#625
Pillars
Overall4033
Code3556
Education6652
Community3334
Reach7823
Momentum4412
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars6,3162,180
Forks571430
Public repos38122
Active repos (90d)126
External contributors222
Avg polish3552
Avg AI-readiness1438

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Fastmail developer profileView Sage developer profile