Open-source software developed at Fastmail.
Fastmail vs Talend
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Fastmail (Open-source software developed at Fastmail.) and Talend both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Fastmail (rank #430) holds a narrow lead over Talend (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (40 vs 38). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Talend is ahead of Fastmail. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Fastmail is ahead of Talend. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Fastmail is ahead of Talend. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Fastmail is clearly ahead of Talend. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Fastmail is ahead of Talend.
Fastmail carries 6,316 GitHub stars across 38 public repos, with 12 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Talend shows 486 stars across 148 public repos, 13 active in the last 90 days and 9 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Fastmail's footprint is roughly 13.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Fastmail is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Talend looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Fastmail | Talend |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #430 | #485 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 40 | 38 |
| Code | 35 | 51 |
| Education | 66 | 57 |
| Community | 33 | 23 |
| Reach | 78 | 35 |
| Momentum | 44 | 26 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 6,316 | 486 |
| Forks | 571 | 657 |
| Public repos | 38 | 148 |
| Active repos (90d) | 12 | 13 |
| External contributors | 2 | 9 |
| Avg polish | 35 | 53 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 14 | 34 |