Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Fastmail vs Zammad

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Fastmail (Open-source software developed at Fastmail.) and Zammad both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Zammad (rank #152) holds a modest lead over Fastmail (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (52 vs 40). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zammad is clearly ahead of Fastmail. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zammad is slightly ahead of Fastmail. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zammad is clearly ahead of Fastmail. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Fastmail is clearly ahead of Zammad. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Fastmail is slightly ahead of Zammad.

Fastmail carries 6,316 GitHub stars across 38 public repos, with 12 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Zammad shows 6,394 stars across 11 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 27 external contributors.

Fastmail is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Zammad looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricFastmailZammad
Ranking
Overall rank#430#152
Pillars
Overall4052
Code3563
Education6671
Community3370
Reach780
Momentum4439
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars6,3166,394
Forks5711,687
Public repos3811
Active repos (90d)129
External contributors227
Avg polish3571
Avg AI-readiness1435

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Fastmail developer profileView Zammad developer profile