Fillout vs Flexport

Fillout and Flexport (We're fixing the user experience in global trade. Join us!) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Fillout (rank #510) holds a narrow lead over Flexport (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (37 vs 33). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Flexport is ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Flexport is ahead of Fillout. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Fillout is ahead of Flexport. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Flexport is slightly ahead of Fillout. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Fillout is slightly ahead of Flexport.

Fillout carries 2 GitHub stars across 9 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Flexport shows 145 stars across 69 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Flexport's footprint is roughly 72.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Fillout is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Flexport looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.