Fillout vs Getty Images

Fillout and Getty Images both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Fillout (rank #510) holds a narrow lead over Getty Images (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (37 vs 31). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Getty Images is ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Getty Images is slightly ahead of Fillout. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Fillout is slightly ahead of Getty Images. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Fillout is clearly ahead of Getty Images.

Fillout carries 2 GitHub stars across 9 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Getty Images shows 951 stars across 32 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Getty Images's footprint is roughly 475.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Fillout is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Getty Images looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.