Fillout vs Hashnode

Fillout and Hashnode (Everything you need to start blogging as a developer!) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Fillout (rank #510) holds a narrow lead over Hashnode (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (37 vs 33). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Hashnode is ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Fillout is slightly ahead of Hashnode. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Hashnode is ahead of Fillout. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Fillout is ahead of Hashnode. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Fillout is ahead of Hashnode.

Fillout carries 2 GitHub stars across 9 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Hashnode shows 6,853 stars across 26 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Hashnode's footprint is roughly 3426.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Fillout is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Hashnode looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.