Fillout vs Jamf

Fillout and Jamf both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Jamf (rank #430) holds a narrow lead over Fillout (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (40 vs 37). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Fillout is slightly ahead of Jamf. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Jamf is ahead of Fillout. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Jamf is ahead of Fillout. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Fillout is slightly ahead of Jamf. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Jamf is clearly ahead of Fillout.

Fillout carries 2 GitHub stars across 9 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Jamf shows 7,946 stars across 114 public repos, 20 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Jamf's footprint is roughly 3973.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Fillout is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Jamf looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.