Fillout vs kununu

Fillout and kununu (Let's make work better.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Fillout (rank #510) holds a narrow lead over kununu (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (37 vs 34). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), kununu is clearly ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Fillout is ahead of kununu. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Fillout is ahead of kununu. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Fillout is slightly ahead of kununu. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), kununu is clearly ahead of Fillout.

Fillout carries 2 GitHub stars across 9 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. kununu shows 132 stars across 40 public repos, 17 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but kununu's footprint is roughly 66.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Fillout is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. kununu looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.