Fillout vs Linear

Fillout and Linear (A purpose-built tool for planning and building products) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Linear (rank #103) holds a modest lead over Fillout (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (55 vs 37). The gap of 18 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Linear is ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Linear is slightly ahead of Fillout. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Linear is ahead of Fillout. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Linear is clearly ahead of Fillout. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Linear is clearly ahead of Fillout.

Fillout carries 2 GitHub stars across 9 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Linear shows 1,971 stars across 22 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Linear's footprint is roughly 985.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Fillout is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Linear looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.