Fillout vs Lodgify

Fillout and Lodgify both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Fillout (rank #510) holds a narrow lead over Lodgify (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (37 vs 30). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Lodgify is slightly ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Lodgify is ahead of Fillout. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Fillout is ahead of Lodgify. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Fillout is clearly ahead of Lodgify. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Lodgify is clearly ahead of Fillout.

Fillout carries 2 GitHub stars across 9 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Lodgify shows 13 stars across 16 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Lodgify's footprint is roughly 6.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Fillout is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Lodgify looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.