Fillout vs Marqeta
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Fillout and Marqeta both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Fillout (rank #510) holds a narrow lead over Marqeta (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (37 vs 32). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Marqeta is slightly ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Marqeta is slightly ahead of Fillout. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Fillout is ahead of Marqeta. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Fillout is ahead of Marqeta.
Fillout carries 2 GitHub stars across 9 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Marqeta shows 84 stars across 18 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Marqeta's footprint is roughly 42.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Fillout is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Marqeta looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Fillout | Marqeta |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #510 | #662 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 37 | 32 |
| Code | 34 | 39 |
| Education | 53 | 59 |
| Community | 27 | 12 |
| Reach | 50 | 40 |
| Momentum | 15 | 15 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 2 | 84 |
| Forks | 4 | 42 |
| Public repos | 9 | 18 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 3 |
| External contributors | 3 | 1 |
| Avg polish | 34 | 43 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 21 | 22 |