Fillout vs Orca Security

Fillout and Orca Security both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Fillout (rank #510) holds a narrow lead over Orca Security (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (37 vs 35). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Orca Security is slightly ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Orca Security is slightly ahead of Fillout. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Orca Security is ahead of Fillout. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Fillout is clearly ahead of Orca Security. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Orca Security is clearly ahead of Fillout.

Fillout carries 2 GitHub stars across 9 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Orca Security shows 230 stars across 35 public repos, 17 active in the last 90 days and 12 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Orca Security's footprint is roughly 115.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Fillout is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Orca Security looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.