Fillout vs Patreon

Fillout and Patreon both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Fillout (rank #510) holds a narrow lead over Patreon (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (37 vs 36). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Patreon is ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Patreon is ahead of Fillout. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Fillout is slightly ahead of Patreon. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Patreon is ahead of Fillout. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Fillout is ahead of Patreon.

Fillout carries 2 GitHub stars across 9 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Patreon shows 846 stars across 62 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Patreon's footprint is roughly 423.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Fillout is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Patreon looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.