Fillout vs Podio

Fillout and Podio both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Podio (rank #430) holds a narrow lead over Fillout (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (40 vs 37). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Podio is slightly ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Podio is slightly ahead of Fillout. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Fillout is slightly ahead of Podio. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Podio is slightly ahead of Fillout. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Podio is slightly ahead of Fillout.

Fillout carries 2 GitHub stars across 9 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Podio shows 2,064 stars across 74 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Podio's footprint is roughly 1032.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Fillout is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Podio looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.