Fillout vs PostHog

Fillout and PostHog (The single platform to analyze, test, observe, and deploy new features) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

PostHog (rank #31) holds a meaningful lead over Fillout (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 37). The gap of 26 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), PostHog is clearly ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), PostHog is slightly ahead of Fillout. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), PostHog is clearly ahead of Fillout. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Fillout is ahead of PostHog. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), PostHog is clearly ahead of Fillout.

Fillout carries 2 GitHub stars across 9 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. PostHog shows 40,819 stars across 357 public repos, 87 active in the last 90 days and 210 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but PostHog's footprint is roughly 20409.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Fillout is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. PostHog looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.