Fillout vs Qonto

Fillout and Qonto both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Qonto (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over Fillout (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 37). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Qonto is clearly ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Qonto is clearly ahead of Fillout. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Fillout is slightly ahead of Qonto. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Fillout is clearly ahead of Qonto. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Qonto is slightly ahead of Fillout.

Fillout carries 2 GitHub stars across 9 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Qonto shows 501 stars across 75 public repos, 11 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Qonto's footprint is roughly 250.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Fillout is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Qonto looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.